F

Scroll down for movie reviews beginning with this letter.

MPAA Rating is the rating given by the Motion Picture Association of America. Please note this is a voluntary rating, so some films (many times older films or obscure foreign films) are not rated.

G - General Audiences

PG - Parental Guidance Suggested

PG13 - Parental Guidance Suggested for those under 13 years of age

R - Restricted (those under 18 not admitted without parent or guardian)

NC-17 (X) - No one under 18 admitted.

USCCB Rating is the rating given by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Please note that some films are not rated simply because the Bishop’s Conference has not reviewed them.

A-I: General Patronage

A-II: Adults and Adolescents

A-III: Adults

L: Limited Adult Audience, problematic content

O: Morally Offensive

Fr. John’s Ratings

★★★★★ - Masterpiece. This film has to show aspects of cinematic excellence that are above and beyond the ordinary and even beyond the “excellent” classification. Because a true masterpiece can be determined only through its ability to endure through the passage of time, no film is even considered for this rating until at least ten years have passed from the date of its initial release.

★★★★ - Excellent

★★★ - Very Good

★★ - Fair

★ - Poor

First Man (2018) ★★★1/2

Length:  141 minutes.  MPAA Rating:  PG-13.  USCCB Rating:  A-III.  Director:  Damien Chazelle.  Loud explosions and frightening and intense scenes might be too much for young children.

A test pilot is flying an X-15 spaceplane at amazing speed.  We are in the cockpit with him, experiencing every frightening moment as he briefly loses control of the plane and even does some bouncing off the atmosphere.  At times he can hardly breathe, and it seems as if he could lose his life at any moment.  After a harrowing few minutes, the pilot successfully lands the plane.  And that’s just the beginning of the film.

First Man tells the story of Neil Armstrong, the first human being to set foot on the moon.  The film wisely expands its vision to include much more than the lunar flight that made Armstrong famous.  It also includes his brush with death in the X-15, his extraordinary rolling nightmare in the Gemini 8 spacecraft (a horrifying tumble at the rate of 296 degrees per second), and his ejection from a crashing lunar lander test vehicle. 

In all these scenes, as well as the beautifully executed lunar landing (re-created in exacting detail, including Armstrong’s famous switch to manual to avoid a sea of boulders), the emphasis is not on who Armstrong was but on what Armstrong experienced.  More than anything else, this is a film of immersion – a cinematic work that is intent on putting the audience in the driver’s seat.  We hear, see, and feel everything – and we are convinced that we have lived through the amazing experiences of America’s favorite astronaut.

Ryan Gosling’s portrayal of Armstrong is muted and understated.  This should be of no surprise to Gosling fans who know that, for this actor, less is usually more.  Still, we are left wanting more emotive content about Armstrong the man and what made him tick.

The film notably omits the planting of the American flag on the moon – an omission that rightly caused some controversy.  While director Damien Chazelle claimed he wanted to place emphasis on “unseen aspects” of the lunar mission, Chazelle’s reticence to show the flag seems unusual.  Not only is the planting of the American flag not shown, the flag itself is shown only in very distant shots, so that we can barely make out the small red white and blue smudge in the middle of the screen. 

This is strange most especially because there are precious few lunar landing artifacts associated with the Apollo 11 mission – the lunar module, the two astronauts, the American flag, and the modest experiments set up outside.  Eliminate any one of these elements and it becomes noticeable – painfully so.  It is Chazelle’s careful avoidance of the flag that unnecessarily draws attention to itself and creates the controversy in the first place.  A single shot of Buzz Aldrin standing next to the flag, or even walking by the flag, would have been sufficient for most audiences.  But Chazelle’s bizarre decision actually ruins what could have been a perfect re-creation of this historic event by placing emphasis on avoiding the flag instead of simply depicting the lunar landing in its fullest reality.  It’s like making a film about the Statue of Liberty while avoiding any shots of the torch.  It makes no sense and is distracting for the audience.

Other than that notable omission, First Man is an amazing, immersive experience and a loving tribute to all who worked on the Apollo project.


Frankenstein (1931) ★★★★

Length:  70 minutes.  MPAA Rating:  Not rated.  USCCB Rating:  None.  Director:  James Whale

My father was a boy when Universal’s Frankenstein first arrived in theaters.  He remembered clearly the young men and boys in the audience shouting, “Hey sweetie! Hey cutie pie!” when the monster appeared on the screen.  They did so out of nervousness – in 1931 the appearance of the monster was so appalling, frightening, and grotesque that young audiences resorted to joking and nervous laughter to break the tension.

In today’s world, in which the bloody, slimy baby creature from the movie Alien (1979) is seen no more as a clever little puppet of a by-gone era, the Frankenstein monster is positively archaic – but also iconic.

The eponymous character, portrayed by the delightfully deranged Colin Clive, is a mad scientist bent on creating life itself.  Though he, perhaps, imagines himself to be the large fatherly figure of Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel ceiling, imparting life with a fingertip, the “real” Dr. Frankenstein is no more than a young, idealistic science reject who experiments in a dirty castle, assisted only by a hunchback named Fritz.  He “creates” life by stitching together various body parts and sending Fritz off to find a brain.  Breaking the jar containing the “normal” brain, Fritz brings his boss the “abnormal” tissue instead. With fun, noisy machines and a brilliant lightning storm to complete the picture, Dr. Frankenstein goes into hysterical ecstasy when seeing the new monster’s hand move slightly.  “It’s alive!  It's alive!” he proclaims, like no other actor has done before or since.  Then the fun begins.

The movie is so iconic it is difficult to appreciate how groundbreaking it was at the time.  Boris Karloff, as the monster, lumbers along in a scary but delightful fashion.  He wears extensive appliance makeup that’s rivaled only by Lon Chaney Sr.’s painful creations from many years before.

But it is the young Colin Clive (Dr. Frankenstein) who steals the show, carrying the film along with a performance far more frightening than Karloff’s.  Perhaps some of Clive’s real-life nightmares contributed to his performance – we will never know for sure.  We do know that after years of alcoholism, he died just six years after this film was made, at the tender age of 37.  His Frankenstein performance has endured for nearly a century – enthralling us to this day.